When I played the first mission, I noticed that the missions were about longer than some of the previous Medal of Honor games that I had played on PS2. Jumping out of a plane and parachuting either towards a safe drop point or a enemy is a hard choice, the latter gets you killed faster but your closer to the enemy. There are 3 types of landings and that's just getting out of the plane! You can switch weapons with enemies, if they have a different weapon and there is a new (I haven't seen it before) “Weapon Experience” system integrated which works to give you an upgrade (Improved Accuracy,More Damage) but still keeps the sense of realism in the game. It can be improved, a mention before, through longer gameplay and better graphics, but it's still a great game to play (and you can score some of the achievement quite easily for some GamerScore Points).

I had great expectations for this game but was somewhat disappointed. Graphically there are issues it can be very choppy and things disappear like windows on buildings and i can take ages to focus. At first i thought maybe its my TV so i brought a HDTV but still the graphic flaws happened and its was the same on PS3 version. I bought Call of Duty 3 and soon relised the MOAAirBorne was just obviously rushed. Call of Duty 3 is a much better game with awesome graphics even being 2 years older.

It has amazing graphics, intense gameplay, and it's a lot of fun, but the campaign is too short and can be finished within a few hours on any difficulty setting. I found this pretty disappointing after so much effort had been put into the rest of the game. Although the game itself is quite short, I still enjoy playing it and I would do so every now and then. I would definitely recommend it to everyone who is a big fan of war games.