Excerpt from Papers of William Paterson on the Federal Convention, 1787 Virginia and the New Jersey plans, and they certainly throw light on the character of Paterson's arguments. The notes were not made in accordance with any definite system as were those of Madison. They are not so coherent and well arranged as even those of Yates, King, or Pierce. In a few cases Paterson, following the speakers, made brief abstracts of their speeches in order to emphasize the thoughts that he considered most important. Other notes were prepared merely as memoranda for a reply to an opponent. In some cases there appear in the same memorandum to be references to speeches made on different days for example, the papers that seem to be notes for Paterson's speech of June 9 likewise include, apparently, mention of what Butler said on June 11. It is not impossible, therefore, that Paterson sketched out these thoughts for his speech, and, after he had spoken, inserted any remarks that had been made in opposition in order that he might make cogent reply. If this is not the case, and the explana tion does not seem very satisfactory, then he simply jotted down thoughts for a speech, and for the purpose of argument inserted the statements of others as he remembered them. He worked over his argument at various times, and thrust into his outline the words of others on which he intended to comment. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.