This text traces Plato's struggle to simultaneously understand and convey the erotic presence of Socrates. Most commentators have supposed Plato assumed an ironic distance from Socrates. Ranasinghe claims the dialogues reflect Plato's awe and frustration before the enigmatic figure whose conduct fascinated and bewildered Classical Athens. In readings of the "Republic", the "Protagoras", the "Phaedo" and the "Symposium", Ranashinghe uncovers the profound literary and thematic unity of each work and shows new conections among the dialogues. From this re-reading, Ranasinghe proposes new answers to such perennial problems as the invalidity of the four proofs of the soul's immortality in the "Phaedo", the draconian nature of the perfect regime described in the "Republic" and the nature of Socrates' dalliance with Alcibiades in the "Symposium". The book begins with an exegesis of the "Republic" that defends Socrates against the charge that he offers the blueprint for a totalitarian state - this slander must be refuted, Ranasinghe argues, before Plato can be understood as a liberal humanist. The chapter on the "Protagoras" examines the roots of sophistry and explicates a similarity between Protagoras and the nihilistic intellectual of the present day. The chapter of the "Phaedo" attacks the depiction of Plato as an otherworldly mystic who despised human existence. Two final chapters on the "Syposium" reveal the true Socrates. He is, Ranasinghe finds, an exemplary citizen and a human being passionately devoted to his mission of reconciling the mind to the desires.