Many people, to include those in government, believe that what they deem is ethical is based on natural or physical facts. Any greater power may assume justifiability when making moral judgements against another on the presumption that the opposing other missed observing natural facts. Since moral disagreement is far more obvious, real, and apparently a natural aspect of the world, the nature of moral discourse and moral facts had to be examined against ethical naturalism. I only hope that I have shed some light for why dialectical reasoning and ridding chauvinism is so important. - Cornell Horn