Excerpt from The British Medical Journal, Vol. 2: Being the Journal of the British Medical Association; July to December, 1863 So ends this correspondence. We do not, how ever, for a moment suppose that the shabbiness of the executors will he eventually carried out in practice and endorsed by the heirs. The heirs can not repudiate, as the executors have done, on the pretence of duty and disinterestedness. Appended to the correspondence, are two letters well worthy of especial note, from Dr. Watson and Dr. Latham. They point out distinctly what is the line of practice in cases of this kind. We are quite unable to understand how Sir T. Gladstone, who quotes medical authorities (of Edinburgh) can honestly resist these English authorities; nor how he can resist the evidence of Dr. Latham, which he formerly misquoted against Dr. Vose. If Dr. Latham's authority misquoted and the Edinburgh authority of Professor Miller are worthy of note, surely equally so are the London authority of the President of the College of Physicians and of Dr. Latham truly quoted. The baronet cannot have it both ways if he selects his own knife for cutting. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.