Since the Emancipation Proclamation, there had been a responsibility bestowed on those who procured what its history entailed. The path left by these past challenges the status quo's idea inherited perhaps from a generation of schemes by people of different social and/or ethnic persuasion. It's neither sorrow nor callousness of the radicalized culture, for repression felt like decades of endless illusions precipitated by intrigue spans of collective thoughts genuinely theorized to help complete the cultural collapse of people of diverse ethnicities. But how could this incorrigible perception precipitate as the critical endeavor pre-Industrial Revolution? And the result encouraged generations of division, perhaps more than anyone expected, not the kind of economic prosperity desired when it meant depositing humans, a farce determined to degrade and demoralize a race. But why, when the manumission of the concept remained firm since eloquent men of this faculty later occupied a high position. The Emancipation Proclamation benefited Hispanics and Chinese as well, although ultimately, blacks were burdened and still are by the sting of suppression and hard life and by the constant antisocial chaos. The extreme tensions have not only changed the culture in the regions but have also spread vile behaviors that produce hope of nothingness. And when one thinks things are improving, the residuality of Generation X, Y, and the Millenia have toned up rhetoric that makes it worse. It's even more evident from the beginning that something has collateralized hatred. The intention and its selfish benefits have fostered superiority waves to benefit or uplift one set over another, thus, produced antisocial behaviors to model a comparative approach to someone's design. Imagine the many accolades earned and awards handed to individuals post-Emancipation, some deserving, that is, if we were to tweak the process and looked back in time to think on those who have helped to turn the process of progress. It's those often neglected though even if the thought meant generating a simple talking point, not of slander or ridicule, which would be wrong, and probably not by liberating them on an island. Undeservedly rather privilege them to live their last days in contentment and peace, but the sole purpose was to damage.